 |
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
Topics:
Theoretical Development
Education and Practice
Research
Theoretical Development
How do you define comfort for
nursing research?
Holistic comfort is defined as the immediate experience of
being strengthened through having the needs for relief, ease, and transcendence
met in four contexts of experience (physical, psychospiritual, social,
and environmental) [Kolcaba, K. (1992). Holistic comfort: Operationalizing
the construct as a nurse-sensitive outcome. Advances in Nursing Science,
15(1), 1-10, p. 6.; Kolcaba, K & Fisher, E. (1996). A holistic perspective
on comfort care as an advance directive.
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly,
18(4), 66-76, p. 68.]
How do you define the types and contexts
of comfort?
TYPES:
Relief: the state of a patient who has had a specific need met.
Ease: the state of calm or contentment.
Transcendence: the state in which one rises above one's problems
or pain.
CONTEXTS IN WHICH COMFORT IS EXPERIENCED:
Physical: pertaining to bodily sensations and homeostatic mechanisms.
Psychospiritual: pertaining to internal awareness of self, including
esteem, concept, sexuality, and meaning in one's life; one's relationship
to a higher order or being.
Environmental: pertaining to external surroundings, conditions,
and influences.
Sociocultural: pertaining to interpersonal, family, and societal
relationships. Also to family traditions, rituals, and religious practices.
(from Critical Care
Nursing Quarterly, 1996, 18(4), p. 69.)
Why do you combine psychological comfort
and spiritual comfort into one context of experience called "psychospiritual"?
They were combined because indicators of each overlapped and,
in some cases, were identical (e.g. meaningfulness, faith, identity, self-esteem).
Judith Spross independently combined psychological and spiritual contexts
the same way and came up with the same contexts of experience in her work
about suffering.
What is the relationship between comfort and pain?
Comfort is a larger umbrella
term compared to pain. As stated above, there are three types of comfort:
relief, ease, and transcendence. Relief is the absence of specific previous
discomforts, a common one being pain which can be of varying intensity.
Pain that has a physical origin also is influenced by psychospiritual,
sociocultural, and environmental factors.
I define pain as a multidimensional
discomfort including sensory, cognitive, and affective components
(Melzak & Wall, 1982). It is a specific sensation in the body that
“hurts” with a varying degree of intensity (for example, from mild to severe
or from 1 to 10). The discomfort of pain is often a significant detractor
from comfort. Looking at pain holistically, pain is intensified by lonliness,
fear, anxiety, noxious stimuli, anger, etc.
What nurse theorists are incorporated
into your conceptualization of comfort?
Relief: Orlando
Ease: Henderson
Transcendence:Paterson & Zderad
[See Taxonomic Structure and/or Operationalizing articles for complete
references.] Contexts of comfort come from nursing literature on holism.
[Explanation for their derivation in same articles.]
Why is your definition of comfort so
complicated?
Comfort is a complex concept but, prior to this work, was defined
negatively as absence of pain, nausea, and itching. My definition defines
comfort as a positive concept and accounts for its many aspects beyond
physical comfort. The taxonomic structure enables us to identify comfort
needs, design interventions targeted to those needs, and measure the effectiveness
of those interventions.
How did you get started in your study
of comfort?
An early assignment in my MSN program (by Dr. Rosemary Ellis)
was to diagram my nursing practice. At that time, I was a head nurse on
an Alzheimer's unit and I used the concept of comfort to designate the
state I wanted my patients to be when they weren't trying to perform special
tasks. At a presentation of my "framework" to a gerontological conference,
I was asked if I had done a concept analysis of comfort. I replied, "No,
but that's the next step." Actually, I hadn't thought about it before,
but realized that it should be my next step, and I had an obligation
to do so after commiting myself publically. (That was 12 years ago!)
Would you please provide detailed information about your personal background?
What were the influences and/or context in which you developed Comfort
Theory?
Some of my background is on my personal page of my web site and
much more is in my book. But I guess the biggest influences on me were:
- The
death of my father when he was 39, I was 8, my brother (John) was 6 and my
mom was only 33.
- The
courage of my mom to buy a house for the three of us before she had a job,
and then her raising of us with the right mixture of trust, encouragement,
and hands-off discipline. John and I didn’t need much discipline, as we were
good kids. I don’t think we even minded being relatively poor as we were in
an ordinary working class school and neighborhood, where we fit quite well.
I had wonderful friends in high school whom I still see often.
- My
mother was always concerned about what people would say if family “”secrets”
became public (not that ours were particularly interesting!). Her mother
was rather heavy handed in this regard, and my mom has a hard time even now
being straight forward. As a result, I try to be very direct in my writing
and speaking. But she never put any limitations on my brother or me, as far
as what we could achieve and she was proud when we did well in school. She
was supportive of our ideas and accomplishments. But I always missed having
a father, still do!
- We
continued visiting my father’s family every summer (about a 6 hour drive)
and I believe I am more like them than my mother’s family. I particularly
admired my paternal grandmother who was more intellectual, strong willed,
and direct than my maternal grand mother. Because of her, I have a positive
view on aging, and went into gerontology.
- My
choice to be a nurse when I was in high school was made because I like
people and science. A local diploma program gave me a full scholarship so I
could give my half of my insurance money (from my father’s death) to my
brother for a state university. At this time, the most common way to be a
nurse was with a diploma from a hospital-based “training” program. We were
not exposed to nursing theory, and I don’t think much was available at that
time (in the 1960’s) anyway.
- I always
loved nursing, but also wanted to be a stay at home mom, so I worked part
time in a variety of settings while my girls were little. I didn’t go to
graduate school until I was in my late 30’s and my children were pretty
independent. At that point in my “career” I wanted more responsibility but
couldn’t get promoted without a college degree. But I gathered lots of
clinical experience in my early years, so I knew what specialties I liked. I
was drawn particularly to dementia care, forming the foundations for
Comfort Theory, I had to be a nurse-detective because my patients couldn’t
verbalize why they were uncomfortable. Our practice was very compassionate,
required strong leadership, creativity, and empathy. These were the
characteristics of nursing that I valued a lot, rather than technology. (The
movie ET aroused in me very negative feelings when he was hooked up
to all that equipment. I paid attention because I was about to accept a
perioperative nursing position with lots of technological components. I
realized that job wasn’t for me, and also began thinking about the
importance of comfort in nursing.)
- My
brother died of cancer when he was 41, and during his illness I gained more
experience with comforting actions of nurses, and how to articulate what
they did. Because of that experience and its timing, my dissertation is
about women with breast cancer, not dementia or gerontology. And I have done
a lot of work with end of life comfort.
- My spirituality, which my
mother fostered and role-modeled for me, has also had a strong influence.
Why do you call your theory a "mid-range"
Theory of Comfort?
This is not a broad or grand theory. The working part of the
theory, the last FULL line of the conceptual framework (Diagram 2) matches
up to the description of the theory on page one (it diagrmas the relationships
between the concepts). Also, the theory can be easily operationalized for
appropriate settings. When each concept is operationalized, you have a
practice level theory.
How do you define the metaparadigm concepts?
Nursing: the intentional assessment of comfort needs, design of comfort
measures to address those needs, and re-assessment of patients' or community
comfort after implementation of comfort measures, compared to a previous
baseline.
Patient: an individual, family, or community in need of health care.
Environment: exterior influences (physical, political, institutional, etc.)
which can be manipulated
to enhance comfort.
Health: optimum function of a patient/family/community facilitated by
enhanced comfort.
What is borrowed and what is unique about
Comfort Theory?
I borrowed the ideas about Relief, Ease, and Transcendence as stated
above. Later, I "borrowed" the contexts of experience from the literature
review about holism. I put these ideas together in a unique way. Later,
I borrowed the framework for the First and Second parts of Comfort Theory
from Henry Murray (see comfort theory article). But I hung nursing concepts
on his abstract framework in a unique way. The idea of institutional outcomes
was unique and was added through a process Tomen and Alligood call retroduction.
Can Comfort Theory be used in different cultures?
Comfort has been described
in Canadian, Hispanic, and Australian cultures. In addition, I have inquiries
from Iran, Turkey, Thailand, China, South America, Normay, etc. So I think
COMFORT is a universal concept. The first step to testing comfort theory
in other cultures would be to translate the instrument into a different
language. I am looking for volunteers!
On a continuum, what is the opposite of comfort?
I believe the opposite
of comfort is suffering.
What are the latest developments with Comfort
Theory?
I changed social comfort to sociocultural comfort.
I added the concept and
definition of Institutional Integrity to the theory to address the trend
in nursing research and practice to measure outcomes of nursing care. Recently,
the definition of Institutional Integrity (InL) was expanded to include regions,
states, and countries and InI was linked to Best Practices and Best
Policies. I felt this change was necessary to keep up with current trends in
health care. Lately, hospitals are interested in improving patient
satisfaction scores, and I think adopting comfort theory for their practice
environment is the "way to go."
How is comfort different from caring?
These are the main points I
would like you to remember about the concepts of comfort and caring:
1. comfort is a
patient outcome. Caring is about how nurses do their work.
2. the effects of caring are difficult to measure; the effects of
comfort interventions (including caring) are measureable
3. comfort (as I use it) is a noun (outcome or product), caring is an
adjective - it describes a process.
4. comfort theory is testable - I have built my career on testing it. Is
Swanson's theory testable? What kind of design for each?
5. there is one taxonomy of comfort, and 12 aspects (cells of the grid).
They are inter related - always - because this is a holistic theory.
Can you provide definitions, propositions, and
assumptions for your theory?
| |
Table 1.
Definitions of concepts in Kolcaba’s middle range Theory of Comfort
|
Health
care needs: Deficits
in any context of comfort that arise from stressful health care
situations and which the patient’s natural support system cannot
meet.
|
|
Nursing
interventions:
Comfort measures that nurses design and implement that are
targeted to the health care needs. These interventions have the
explicit goal of enhancing the patient’s immediate comfort
and/or facilitating subsequent desirable health seeking
behaviors.
|
|
Intervening variables:
Factors that each patient brings to the health care situation,
that nurses cannot change, and that have an impact on the
success of the interventions.
|
|
Comfort:
The immediate experience of being strengthened through having
the needs for relief, ease, or transcendence met in the
physical, psychospiritual, environmental, and social contexts of
experience [General Comfort Questionnaire].
|
|
|
Relief:
|
The state
of a patient who has had a specific need met.
|
|
|
Ease: |
The state
of calm or contentment.
|
|
|
Transcendence: |
The state
in which one rises above one’s problems or pain.
|
|
|
Physical: |
Pertaining
to bodily sensations and functions.
|
|
|
Psychospiritual: |
Pertaining
to self-esteem, self-concept, sexuality, meaning in one’s life,
and one’s relationship to a higher order or being.
|
|
|
Environmental: |
Pertaining
to the external. |
|
|
Social: |
Pertaining
to interpersonal, family, and societal relationships.
|
|
Health
seeking behaviors:
Internal or external behaviors in which the patient engages that
facilitate health or a peaceful death (Schlotfeldt, 1975).
They can be internal (healing, T-cell formation, oxygenation,
etc.) or external (observable behaviors such as working in
therapy, length of stay in hospital, ambulation, functional
status). [Choose the measure most applicable to your setting.]
Institutional Integrity:
Stability and ethics of any hospital, health care system,
region, state, or country. When institutions do better, patients
do better and visa versa. |
Table 2.
Propositions in Kolcaba’s middle-range Theory of Comfort
|
1. Nurses identify the
patient’s comfort needs that have not been met by existing
support systems.
2. Nurses design
interventions to address those needs.
3. The Intervening variables
are taken into account in designing the interventions and
mutually agreeing upon reasonable immediate (enhanced comfort)
and/or subsequent (health seeking behaviors) outcomes.
4. If enhanced comfort is
achieved, patients are strengthened to engage in health seeking
behaviors or a peaceful death.
5. When patients engage in
health seeking behaviors more fully, Institutions do better and
institutions with higher "integrity" facilitate higher
engagement in HSBs. |
Table 3.
Assumptions underpinning Kolcaba’s middle-range Theory of Comfort
|
1. Human beings have holistic responses to complex
stimuli.
2. Comfort is a desirable
holistic outcome that is germaine to the discipline of nursing.
3. Human beings strive to
meet, or to have met, their basic comfort needs. It is an
active endeavor.
4.
When comfort needs are met, patients are strengthened. |
|
What are the latest developments with Comfort Theory?
Latest
developments with CT: I recently expanded the definition of InI to include
health care organizations at local, regional, state, and national levels. In
addition to hospital systems, the definition of “institutions” includes Public
Health agencies, Medicare and Medicaid programs, Home Care agencies, Nursing
Home consortiums, etc. Examples of variables related to this expanded definition
of InI include cost savings, improved access, decreased morbidity rates,
decreased hospitalizations and readmissions, improved health-related outcomes,
efficiency of services and billing, and positive cost-benefit ratios.
Education and Practice
Isn't comfort care impractical in a downsized
setting?
Is comfort care difficult to
learn?
Does the
framework of comfort care account for medical problems of patients?
Care plans
are becoming obsolete. Are there other heuristic devices for students to
help them learn the art of comfort care?
How can I experience a comforting intervention?
Considering cultural
competence issues, how difficult has it been to adapt the General Comfort
Questionaire to different cultures?
Students who work in the ICU felt the theory would be quite difficult to apply
in their practice setting. Have you any advice for them and has any research
been done in this area?
Is the Comfort Theory being used in any hospitals as their
philosophy to guide nursing practice? Or being used in universities to guide
curriculum?
Isn't comfort care impractical in
a downsized setting?
Comfort care is efficient and satisfying
to patients and nurses; thus, it is even more important in a time of limited
resources. Plus, comfort care offers a framework for making nurses recognizable
and indispensable because of what they do. When patients and families associate
enhanced comfort with Registered Nurses, they will DEMAND that RNs are
readily available.
Also, Comfort Care is a framework for interdisciplinary
health care, as it focuses on patients. As such it is a unifying framework
for care for the future.
Note: when presenting comfort care to students last semester, one earnest
young man who had some prior experience working in nursing homes raised
his hand and asked, "Is this a new concept? I have never seen it being
practiced!" I think this is a wake-up call to us in nursing practice and
education to get back to the basics.
Is comfort care difficult
to learn?
No. Comfort care is intuitive because we are all familiar with
our own comfort. The template for comfort care can be applied repeatedly
but individualistically to most patients, so that it becomes automatic.,
thorough, and satisfying.
Does
the framework of comfort care account for medical problems of patients?
Yes! Physical comfort includes oxygenation, elimination, mobility,
cognitive abilities, electrolyte balance, hydration, pain management, and
all aspects of the medical problem(s).
Care
plans are becoming obsolete. Are there other heuristic devices for students?
Yes! On clinical preparation sheets, students can identify
comfort needs in four contexts: physical (see above definition of physical
comfort), psychospiritual, social, and environmental. Students should list,
in another section, the intervening variables so a full picture of each
patient emerges. Then, they can list interventions, patients perception
of comfort after the interventions, what next, realistic health seeking
behaviors, and expected insitutiional outcomes (patient satisfaction is
the easiest).
What is your current initiative with Comfort Theory?
See section on
Magnet Status.
How can I experience a comforting intervention?
You may try relaxing with
my Guided Imagery audio available to everyone by
clicking
here
Considering cultural competence issues, how difficult has it been to adapt the
General Comfort Questionaire to different cultures?
The General Comfort Questionairre and variations of there of have been
adapted for many other languages, most lately Korean, Portuguese, Italian,
Japanese etc. (See instrument section). It seems to have wide applicability
across cultures.
Students
who work in the ICU felt the theory would be quite difficult to apply in their
practice setting. Have you any advice for them and has any research been done
in this area?
The assessment of comfort needs is
certainly different in ICU, especially if the patient is non-verbal.
However, I think nurses are astute as discerning if a patient is
comfortable, and possible detractors from comfort when they seem restless,
are grimacing, etc. Families are often very useful in this detective work,
and their presence alone, is a comfort measure. Maintaining homeostasis is
an important part of physical comfort, so interventions to assure
homeostasis, in this theory, are called comfort interventions too. I think
having a basic pattern to apply for assessment, intervention, and evaluation
makes our nursing care more efficient where ever the setting. Refer also to
the Comfort Behaviors Checklist as a guide to assessment of non-verbal
patients.
To view other nurses' use of CT in practice, see our message
board.
Is
the Comfort Theory being used in any hospitals as their philosophy to guide
nursing practice? Or being used in universities to guide curriculum?
My “pet project” now is to consult with large health
care systems to enhance their working environments. This is important for
retention of nurses, better patient outcomes, and is also useful when
applying for national recognitions. Several hospitals are using CT for the
Magnet Status application process. An article about this is out in JONA in
November 2006 by Kolcaba, Tilton, and Drouin. See Enhancing Your Work
Environment link.
What are the philosophical
underpinnings of your theory?
Please see the attached article:
Evolution
Research
What was the topic of your dissertation?
What statistical method do you recommend for
comfort research?
What research have you worked
on?
Can I ask you questions about developing my research
design?
You stated that
you hoped to conduct research on health seeking behaviors and institutional
integrity in the next 5 years (which would have been 2002-present). Were you
able to document a positive correlation between HSB and institutional integrity?
Use of taxonomic structure?
What was the topic of your dissertation?
I did a pilot study of the General Comfort Questionnaire while in graduate
school. At CWRU, I was told, this was not sufficient for graduation.
My advisor then "suggested" I do an intervention study to see if comfort
was really measureable. Therefore, I chose a population which had acute
comfort needs (women with early-stage breast cancer), a holistic intervention
that was practical for implementation (audiotaped guided imagery), and
three repeated measures in order to demonstrate a trend if any existed.
I graduated in Dec., 1996 after 11 years in the doctoral program at FPB!
(Eleven years sounds awful but I took one course at a time while working
full time at The University of Akron and raising a family.) My dissertation
article was published in Kolcaba, K. & Fox, C. (1999). The effects
of guided imagery on comfort of women with early stage breast cnancer undergoing
radiation therapy.
Oncology Nursing Forum,26(1), 67-72..
A second article that tests theoretical assumptions of comfort can be found
in Kolcaba, K. & Steiner, R. Empirical evidence for the nature of holistic
comfort. Journal of Holistic Nursing,18 (1), 46-62..
What statistical method do you recommend
for comfort research?
Because comfort theoretically is state specific, it should be measured
prior to your intervention and at least two times after the intervention.
Repeated Measures MANOVA is recommended for statistical analysis because
time is used as a contrast on the mean of the dependent variables (your
measurements of comfort at each time point). Also, subjects serve as their
own controls. Trend analysis can be used to demonstrate the model of differences
in comfort over time between treatment and control groups.
Data from verbal or numeric rating scales
(see instruments section) are quick and reliable for clinical use or research. I
no longer recommend visual analog scales because they are not sensitive enough
for research. For reliability, use test-retest methods asking patients about
comfort at no less than 10 minute intervals, without an intervention. (Test-retest reliability is not appropriate
when considerable time has elapsed, especially in stressful health care
situations, because the state of comfort is too variable.
What research have you worked
on?
Urinary incontinence was the first program of
research I conducted with my partner, Dr. Therese Dowd. (see references
below)
Schirm, V.,
Baumgardner, J., Dowd, T., Gregor, S., & Kolcaba, K. (2004). Development
of a healthy bladder education program for older adults. Geriatric
Nursing, 25(5), 301-306.
Dowd, T.,
Kolcaba, K., & Steiner, R. (2003).
The addition of coaching to cognitive strategies. Journal of Ostomy
and Wound Management, 30(2), 90-99.
We developed a hand massage intervention that
theoretically would enhance the comfort of dying patients. (link to
reference page for article on hand massage and hospice patients).
We are also doing health
promotion studies, and relating the immediate outcome of comfort to subsequent HSBs such as
using Healing Touch to reduce stress symptoms in college students.
(article in press, November 2007, Holistic Nursing Practice) **A chapter about Comfort Theory is published in the nursing textbook,
Nursing Theorists and Their Work (5th Edition) by Tomey and Alligood.
(Chapter 24).
Can I ask you questions about developing my
research design?
Yes. Please use my e-mail address
kolcaba@uakron.edu. Again, thank you for your interest!
You
stated that you hoped to conduct research on health seeking behaviors and
institutional integrity in the next 5 years (which would have been
2002-present). Were you able to document a positive correlation between HSB and
institutional integrity?
Actually, I am depending on other
nurses to do this for me, especially as institutions apply for Magnet
Status. Patient satisfaction is a InI measure that is already obtained and
can be related to other HSBs. However, I as an outside consultant to
hospital systems, do not have access to those satisfaction data.
I
am working on a presentation of your theory of comfort and can't quite grasp how
the GCQ is used with the taxonomic structure. I see how each cell has a negative
or positive number based on the question in the GQC, but it is unclear to me how
you can score the results. I would appreciate any help I can get on this?
(submitted by a student)
You
score the results by reverse coding the negative items. For example, if the
item states "I am fatigued" that is not comfort. Persons who respond
strongly agree (6) will be coded (1), persons who respond (5) will be scored
(2) and so on. You can do this when you enter your data into the data
analysis spread sheet, or the computer can specify which questions need to
be reverse coded.
to the top
|